Quite often one can immediately sense the setting up of a straw man argument from the title. This is the case in my opinion with the paper by Christian Wuthrich, “The fate of presentism in modern physics”. Actually, the title should have been “The fate of eternalism in modern physics”.
Is Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability just a Scholastic Argument?
In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Joe Salerno provides the following introduction to Fitch’s paradox of knowability:
Let us divide by zero – It is a free country
My first post deals with division by zero and how it can be used to basically prove anything. What is frightening is that division ny zero is allowed in some philosophy departments around the world.
This is an example for the beginners from Wikipedia:
Digital Cosmology Blog
Reply